Saturday, October 30, 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010
what we have to look forward to if the repugs win
more thugs in the pockets of repugs
continued repug unprovoked violence
Friday, October 22, 2010
domestic terrorism towards Dems
(Crooks and Liars)
another anti-science repug
(Think Progress)
Thursday, October 21, 2010
poor baby
more good economic news
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
the crazies are out in full force this election season
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
and I bet some veterans will still vote for him
gee, ya think?
wow - is that his vision of America?
WTF?
certainly repugs don't want Latinos voting, but why would Univision accept such an ad?
extreme and out-of-touch
because this is just a talking point to the repugs
you would think that tea-baggers would learn some of the laws of the land
WILMINGTON, Del. - Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to disagree or not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.
">WILMINGTON, Del. - Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to disagree or not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.
">O'Donnell questions separation of church, stateWILMINGTON, Del. – Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to disagree or not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.
The exchange came in a debate before an audience of legal scholars and law students at Widener University Law School, as O'Donnell criticized Democratic nominee Chris Coons' position that teaching creationism in public school would violate the First Amendment by promoting religious doctrine.
Coons said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism but that "religious doctrine doesn't belong in our public schools."
"Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked him.
When Coons responded that the First Amendment bars Congress from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, O'Donnell asked: "You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?"
---
This doesn't really surprise me, but still...pretty freakin' amazing...
And so many people don't realize that this protection was put into the Constitution for the sake of the churches.
Sure would be nice to have politicians who have some idea of how to govern in this country.
Monday, October 18, 2010
cuz Dems are frustrated that more didn't get done and repugs didn't want anything to get done
A productive Congress gets no respect from votersWASHINGTON – The public panned it. Republicans obstructed it. Many Democrats fled from it. Even so, the session of Congress now drawing to a close was the most productive in nearly half a century.
Not since the explosive years of the civil rights movement and the hard-fought debut of government-supported health care for the elderly and poor have so many big things — love them or hate them — been done so quickly.
Gridlock? It may feel that way. But that's not the story of the 111th Congress — not the story history will remember.
Democrats are dearly hoping history won't repeat itself. In 1966, after Democrats created Medicare and Medicaid and passed civil rights laws, they got hammered in the election, losing 48 seats in the House and four in the Senate. They maintained their majorities in both at the time, but an identical result next month would turn the House over to Republicans.
In the 1960s Democrats paid the price for events largely outside their control — an escalating war in Vietnam going badly, rowdy anti-war protests and violence in American cities, said Linda Fowler, professor of government at Dartmouth College.
"I think that's what's going on this time too," Fowler said, "despite a very significant record of accomplishment."
Democrats struggling now to retain majorities in the House and Senate must deal with a public that is quick to blame Washington for the prolonged economic downturn, and that resents the bank bailouts that were actually passed by the previous Congress.
In terms of legislative successes, the current session of Congress is "at least on a par with the 89th Congress" of 1965-1966, said Norman Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
But, he added, Republicans have done all they could to discredit Congress and Democrats have failed to sell their agenda. Moreover, it will take years to fully feel the effects of the health care law and financial regulation.
"A world dominated by bickering and epithet-throwing and bomb tossing in Washington obscures accomplishments," Ornstein said.
Congress passed an $814 billion economic stimulus package soon after President Barack Obama took office, tapping a staggering sum of money to avoid a full-blown depression. Democrats have trumpeted the gains from that effort, but know it's not enough for restive voters. "Americans still see themselves in a ditch," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer.
The two other landmark acts of this session were the health care overhaul, a giant step toward universal coverage that had eluded presidents back to Franklin Roosevelt if not Teddy Roosevelt, and the Wall Street accountability act.Obama has also signed into law at least a dozen other pieces of legislation of significance. They include:
_Making college loans more affordable.
_The Cash for Clunkers program that helped rejuvenate the auto industry.
_New consumer protections for credit card users.
_Making it easier for women to challenge pay discrimination.
_Increasing federal regulation of tobacco products.
_Cracking down on waste in Pentagon weapons acquisition.
_Making attacks based on sexual orientation a federal hate crime.
_Giving businesses tax incentives to hire unemployed workers.
_Tax credits for first-time homeowners.
So where is the love?
Polls suggest three-fourths of Americans disapprove of Congress.
---
Saturday, October 16, 2010
interesting that these "crazies" are never from the left
(Think Progress)
---
Even over the 8 years that bush was provably taking away our rights, shredding the Constitution and send this country into the pits of hell, there was never a fraction of the violence aimed at the repugs as there has been towards the Dems since Obama was elected. And this is all due to the Dems trying to help the country!
what a hateful excuse for a human being
(Think Progress)
---
Of course, we know that this plan will save money, not cost us money, so the argument is absurd and unrealistic, but what an anti-American thing to say.
you would think that there wouldn't even be a debate over something like this
---
But, even despite the terrible economic times that the repugs have forced on us, they still don't care about creating jobs in this country. All they care about are their big-business donors.
And yet, some Americans will still vote against their best interests and for the repug scumbags - something I will never understand...
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
it took me a while before I realized he was trying to make this sound like a bad thing
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
wow - Obama does want the Dems to lose
Feds appeal Mass. rulings against US marriage law
The U.S. Department of Justice has appealed rulings by a judge in Massachusetts who deemed unconstitutional a federal law denying married gay couples federal benefits.
The DOJ on Tuesday filed a notice of appeal in rulings made by U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in two separate lawsuits.
Tauro ruled in July the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional because it interferes with a state's right to define marriage and denies married gay couples an array of federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly said he would like to see the DOMA law repealed. But the Justice Department has defended its constitutionality, which it is required to do.
Massachusetts was the first state to legalize gay marriage.
---
is it really over?
Judge orders 'don't ask, don't tell' injunction
SAN DIEGO – A federal judge issued a worldwide injunction Tuesday immediately stopping enforcement of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, suspending the 17-year-old ban on openly gay U.S. troops.
U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' landmark ruling also ordered the government to suspend and discontinue all pending discharge proceedings and investigations under the policy.
U.S. Department of Justice attorneys have 60 days to appeal. Pentagon and Department of Justice officials said they are reviewing the case and had no immediate comment.
The injunction goes into effect immediately, said Dan Woods, the attorney who represented the Log Cabin Republicans, the gay rights group that filed the lawsuit in 2004 to stop the ban's enforcement.
"Don't ask, don't tell, as of today at least, is done, and the government is going to have to do something now to resurrect it," Woods said. "This is an extremely significant, historic decision. Once and for all, this failed policy is stopped. Fortunately now we hope all Americans who wish to serve their country can."
Legal experts say the Obama administration is under no legal obligation to appeal and could let Phillips' ruling stand.
Phillips' decision was widely cheered by gay rights organizations that credited her with getting accomplished what President Obama and Washington politics could not.
---
While this is fantastic news and long overdue, it is a shame that the Obama administration shied away from this and cannot take credit for overturning this highly unpopular rule as we move towards election.
Sometimes it really seems like the Dems do not want to win...
Rove is an expert in denying facts, but that doesn't make them any less true
Rove denies GOP gets money from foreign sources
Friday, October 08, 2010
not all republicans are insane
maintaining bigotry is as important as jobs?
wouldn't it be nice if someday schools took this seriously?
---
wouldn't it be nice if our politicians lived in the same reality as the rest of us?
Friday, October 01, 2010
hardly surprising
(Huffington Post)
---
It's not like the repugs care about these people or anything...
wow...
(Huffington Post)
---
And, amazingly, CNN does the right thing, instead of encouraging him:
CNN fires host Rick Sanchez over controversial remarks
---
Of course, I'm sure he has a job waiting for him at Fox already.
I guess he's a government worker because he wants to get paid for doing nothing
(Think Progress)
---
I think that most people - at least any sane people - do want the government to do things. That's kind of the point of government. Why are anti-government radicals being elected to government positions in the first place?
do they really expect anyone to believe this?
(Think Progress)
---
C'mon, our president states an obvious fact that everyone in the world knows is true and Fox tries to condemn him for it?
Kinda proves his point, I think...
another typical repug
(Think Progress)
---
I don't think you're allowed to be a republican any more if you're not a hypocrite,
it's about time
---
Only an idiot would think that "abstinence-only" would work with teenagers. Hell - it sure doesn't work with adults who should know better!