another way not to handle the evolution debate
By having two "sides" who basically say the same thing! This Yahoo/USA Today op-ed has two people who agree with creationism/ID - shouldn't one side be on the side of evolution if you are going to have a debate?!
The article is actually titled "what do scientists fear"!!!! Wow! Scientists "fear" (very interesting choice of words) people putting religion (which is what ID is - there is no way around that fact) into a science class. No one says that this can't be debated in philosphy or religion class, but sense ID cannot be tested by scientific methods, then there is not much reason why it should be in a science class.
Why do the IDiots fear logic?!
The article is actually titled "what do scientists fear"!!!! Wow! Scientists "fear" (very interesting choice of words) people putting religion (which is what ID is - there is no way around that fact) into a science class. No one says that this can't be debated in philosphy or religion class, but sense ID cannot be tested by scientific methods, then there is not much reason why it should be in a science class.
Why do the IDiots fear logic?!
<< Home