the IDiocy of ID

The same absurd article intelligently mocked by Pharyngula and Sadly, No!
My favorite paragraph from the original madness:

In truth, intelligent design isn't a scientific theory but a restatement of a timeless argument: that the regularity and laws of the natural world imply a higher intelligence -- God, most people would say -- responsible for its design. Intelligent design doesn't argue that evidence of design ends all questions or disproves Darwin. It doesn't make a religious claim. It does say that when such evidence appears, researchers should take it into account, and that the weaknesses in Darwinian theory should be acknowledged as forthrightly as the strengths. That isn't primitivism or Bible-thumping or flying spaghetti. It's science.

Wow! So much insanity in one little paragraph!
It isn't science but it is science! It is all about God, but it isn't religious!
This people are literally insane! They just don't like facts, so they make up nonsense and claim that it disproves the truth!