Friday, September 16, 2005

why they stayed

Why they stayed in New Orleans
While Republicans have been busy blaming the victims who stayed in New Orleans for their tragedy, The Washington Post, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health have been doing some research on why they stayed:

According to the poll, six in 10 evacuees had family incomes of less than $20,000 last year. Half have children younger than 18. One in eight was unemployed when the storm hit. Seven in 10 said they have no insurance to cover their losses. Fully half have no health insurance. Four in 10 suffer from heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure or are physically disabled. [...]

The survey also provides disquieting clues as to why so many residents remained in New Orleans to face Hurricane Katrina despite orders to evacuate. A third of those who stayed said they never heard the mandatory order to evacuate issued by the mayor the day before the storm hit. Somewhat fewer -- 28 percent -- said they heard the order but did not understand what they were to do. Thirty-six percent acknowledged they heard the order, understood it but did not leave. In hindsight, 56 percent said they could have evacuated, while 42 percent said it was impossible. (WaPo)


(The Next Left)